Should go to a hunter within the originating patch, and over a rogue... and in a serious situation.
WHEN THE %^&* ARE TANKS GETTING A SHIELD!
Hell, if they're getting something this specific, they might as well do a tanking legendary. Frankly, it wouldn't be used by many more specs than the dagger would (Prot(pal)/Prot(war) if it's a 1handed weapon), but at least two classes would get access to it... Or maybe give it a special effect like behaving as a 2 handed weapon statwise unless a shield is equipped, to include DKs/Druids too. 2 Handed Mace legendary would be wieldable by all of the classes. Though it could somehow be misinterpreted as an Arms, Frost/Unholy or Retribution weapon, I guess... The generally higher iLvl a legendary has would probably give it top status for those specs too. Frankly, even though that would mean they get this right after Shadowmourne, I wouldn't mind at all, given the scope it would reach.Rogues haven't had a legendary for a long while, true, but being given one and being alone... Seems awkward.
I'm inclined to think this is legit but a slip with the NDA personally.While warcraft census et al aren't necessarily hideously accurate, rogues have routinely come up as a low percentage of the population for quite a while now. I'm wondering if this is an attempt to boost the class's popularity?Must admit, a literally 1-class weapon - particularly for a class that's had multiple legendaries accessible to it in the past - really doesn't impress me. An awful lot of 10 man guilds won't even end up making one simply cos they have no rogue. Not a terribly legendary legendary.
Although I really cheered upon reading this (ROGUE-ONLY LEGENDARY FCK YEAH!), I'm actually wondering how good a choice it is to implement a Legendary that only one class (and only two of that class' specs) can utilize. Hey, I'm all for "ROGUE WEAPON" but this seems a little bit questionable.That isn't saying I won't be playing in 4.3 just to get this one, though! ^^Not that I ever will
To be honest, it just seems too... no, I can't bring myself to believe that it's going to be a rogue-only legendary. Especially by being a dagger.I know Blizzard said "a more narrow representation", but this is just retarded. A one-handed mace or axe would've been much more fitting, while still being quite narrow.Also, notice that he mentions Cataclysm's other legendarieS - how did one suddenly become two?
*points my middle finger in the general direction of blizzard HQ*Another straw on this camel's back....
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
I don't really care so much about the Dagger, because my Rogue is only level 55 and i don't give a crap about it.The interesting part is...